Close

RESULTS

IPOS: Design Circular No. 3/2018

Effective: 1 Nov 2018

IPOS: Patents Circular No. 9/2018

Effective: 1 Nov 2018

IPOS Case Summary: Monster Energy Company v NBA Properties, Inc [2018] SGIPOS 16

A mere similarity in the subject matter of the competing marks was not sufficient to establish visual similarity to oppose the registration of a trade mark.

Monster Energy Company v NBA Properties, Inc [2018] SGIPOS 16

Trade marks and trade names — Opposition to registration

ADV: Join the IP and innovation industry

Join the vibrant IP and innovation industry through IP Academy’s Specialist Certificate in Intangible Asset Management.

Categories: Headlines
Singapore a hub to value, monetise intangible assets: Indranee

Singapore a hub to value, monetise intangible assets: Indranee

Ms Indranee said in order to strengthen Singapore's IP-rich industries, the country should continue to grow science, technology, engineering and maths expertise.

Categories: Headlines

LawWatch - IPMT August 2018 Edition

This update provides summaries of 4 recent local and international cases on intellectual property, media and technology.

Apex court rules NUH and software firm are joint owners of contested patent

Apex court rules NUH and software firm are joint owners of contested patent

Both NUH and Cicada Cube had worked together to develop the system, which allows samples to be collected from hospital patients in an automated manner for laboratory testing.

Journals Online: Intellectual Property Law

This article in the SAL Annual Review encapsulates and evaluates the 2017 decisions of the Singapore courts on intellectual property law. It is authored by David Tan and Stanley Lai, SC.

IPOS Case Summary: Apple Inc. v Swatch AG (Swatch SA) (Swatch Ltd.) [2018] SGIPOS 15

IPOS Case Summary: Apple Inc. v Swatch AG (Swatch SA) (Swatch Ltd.) [2018] SGIPOS 15

Apple Inc. and Swatch AG cross swords again,  over the respective marks “THINK DIFFERENT” and “Tick different”. Apple argued that the 2 marks were confusingly similar and that Swatch's application was in bad faith. Apple's opposition failed.

Apple Inc v Swatch AG (Swatch SA) (Swatch Ltd) [2018] SGIPOS 15

Trade marks and trade names – Opposition to registration

Singapore High Court clarifies that Reg 24 of Health Products (Therapeutic Products) Regulations 2016 precludes patent owners from commencing an action for prospective acts of patent infringement

In Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc v Drug Houses of Australia Pte Ltd [2018] SGHC 149, the Court declined to grant the Plaintiff's interim interlocutory injunction to restrain prospective acts of patent infringement.

Monster Energy Company v Glamco Co, Ltd [2018] SGIPOS 7

Trade marks and trade names — Opposition to registration

Trade marks and trade names — Opposition to registration
Advertise here!

Terms Of Use Copyright 2018 by Singapore Academy of Law
Back To Top