Parents on trial for son's murder: Earlier medical care may have helped 5-year-old
Scalded boy's condition would not have deteriorated so easily: Burns expert
If a five-year-old boy who was scalded to death had been given medical attention earlier, his condition would not have deteriorated so easily, a burns specialist said yesterday in the trial of the child's parents.
"Time is of the essence in treating extensive burn wounds," Dr Gavin Kang of the KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) told the High Court on the fourth day of the trial.
The boy's parents, Azlin Arujunah and Ridzuan Mega Abdul Rahman, both 27, are charged with murdering their son with common intention, by inflicting severe scald injuries on him. Each of them also faces charges over other abusive acts, including confining the boy in a pet's cage, pinching him with a pair of pliers and hitting him with a broom.
On at least four occasions between Oct 15 and Oct 22, 2016, either Azlin or Ridzuan, or both of them allegedly splashed hot water on the boy.
When the boy collapsed on Oct 22, they took him to KKH - after a six-hour delay - but he died on Oct 23.
Dr Kang, who treated the boy, testified that the child was critically ill, with extensive burns covering about 70 per cent of his body.
"The wounds appeared dirty, with a lot of black debris, suggesting that the patient had not received immediate cleaning or medical attention after the injuries were sustained," he said. Burns on more than 40 per cent to 50 per cent of a person's body are considered life-threatening, said Dr Kang.
As a child's skin is thinner, the wounds would be deeper compared with an adult who suffered burns of the same temperature and duration.
Dr Kang said it was difficult to tell whether the burns on the boy were the result of a single scald or multiple episodes of scalding.
Based on the raw state of the boy's skin, he said, the scald injuries were probably caused within a week of his being taken to hospital.
Also taking the stand was clinical psychologist Leung Hoi Ting, who conducted an intellectual assessment on Ridzuan and concluded that he was not intellectually disabled, although his intelligence was "extremely low to low average".
Ridzuan's lawyer, Mr Eugene Thuraisingam, criticised her report as "erroneous" for saying that he did not show signs of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
A report from a defence psychiatrist concluded that Ridzuan was suffering from ADHD, intermittent explosive disorder and hypnotic use disorder at the time.
Mr Thuraisingam said Ms Leung did not take steps to seek corroboration from Ridzuan's mother, who is in prison, on his growing-up years.
The lawyer noted that when Ridzuan was young, his grandmother called him "bodoh" (Malay for "stupid"), while his uncles found it hard to understand him as he spoke quickly and his sentences did not flow.
As a youngster, Ridzuan was also happy to get zero marks for tests, which the lawyer said was of concern. Ms Leung said this could be due to Ridzuan's family background, growing up with an absent mother.
The trial continues next Monday.
Source: Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction.