Close

RESULTS

Civil Litigation Update (Apr 2024) - Order 3 rule 2(2): Recent cases on the court’s general power

The latest April issue of the Civil Litigation Update examines how the courts have applied or considered O 3 r 2(2) of the Rules of Court 2021 since the Rules’ introduction three years ago.

DFI v DFJ [2024] SGHC(I) 11

Civil Procedure — Costs
Luxury watch investment firm in breach of contract over timepieces worth $2.5m: High Court

Luxury watch investment firm in breach of contract over timepieces worth $2.5m: High Court

The court ordered The WatchFund to fulfil its contractual obligations by repurchasing luxury watches for the $2.5 million it had offered the investors. 

Categories: Headlines
Possible class action lawsuit against Cordlife by customers could take at least 2 years

Possible class action lawsuit against Cordlife by customers could take at least 2 years

Case has many complexities due to different circumstances of each affected family: Withers KhattarWong lawyers.

AI-powered search engine makes S’pore Parliament debates more accessible

AI-powered search engine makes S’pore Parliament debates more accessible

Called Pair Search, the website search.pair.gov.sg is powered by a large language model (LLM) – the same technology behind ChatGPT – and also lets users sift through case judgments from the High Court and Court of Appeal.

[SAL Journal]: Statutory Interpretation and the Limitation Act: Potter v Canada Square Operations Ltd [2023] 3 WLR 963 [Case Note]

This note analyses the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in Potter v Canada Square Operations Ltd [2023] 3 WLR 963 and argues that, in the context of statutory limitation periods, a literal approach to statutory interpretation may help clarify and simplify the law on limitations. This, however, means that amendments will have to be made to the Singapore Limitation Act 1959 and in this vein, this note suggests how this may be done.

Cordlife customers push for legal action

Cordlife customers push for legal action

At least two groups of customers are seeking advice over class-action lawsuits after more than 7,000 cord-blood units found to be damaged or at risk of being adversely affected.

Categories: Headlines
When relatives fight over a family fund worth millions

When relatives fight over a family fund worth millions

The bitter fight was sparked after one of them cried foul for being short-changed, even though he got over $45 million.

Categories: Headlines
High Court allows S$80 million sale of GSM Building to LHN’s Coliwoo

High Court allows S$80 million sale of GSM Building to LHN’s Coliwoo

Judicial Commissioner dismisses minority owners' objections to the sale, finds no evidence that transaction lacks good faith.

Categories: Headlines
High Court dismisses Chinese businessman’s claims against Huttons and agent in misrepresentation suit

High Court dismisses Chinese businessman’s claims against Huttons and agent in misrepresentation suit

Dispute concerns sale and purchase of S$5.1m condo unit at Lloyd Sixty-Five which he was granted an option to purchase and had made payments amounting to S$1.5m.

Three Arrows Capital Ltd and others v Cheong Jun Yoong [2024] SGHC(A) 10

Civil Procedure — Appeals ; Civil Procedure — Service

Foo Yong Siang Victor v Tan Heng Khoon [2024] SGHC 101

Credit And Security — Money and moneylenders

Lim Chee Seng v Phang Yew Kiat [2024] SGHC 100

Civil Procedure — Pleadings ; Civil Procedure — Appeals

Plain and Obvious” Test Applies in Applications for Production of Requested Documents Under Rules of Court 2021: Lutfi Salim bin Talib and another v British and Malayan Trustees Ltd [2024] SGHC 85

In Lutfi Salim bin Talib and another v British and Malayan Trustees Ltd [2024] SGHC 85, the High Court held that the court should not go behind filed affidavits for the purposes of deciding an application under O 11 r 3(1) of the Rules of Court 2021, unless there are very strong reasons to do so.


Terms Of Use Privacy Statement Copyright 2024 by Singapore Academy of Law
Back To Top