Close

HEADLINES

Headlines published in the last 30 days are listed on SLW.

I gave incriminating statement to avoid court case, says accused molester

I gave incriminating statement to avoid court case, says accused molester

Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 13 Nov 2019
Author: Shaffiq Alkhatib

The lawyer is now contesting the admissibility of  a statement given in November 2017, stating the IO had offered to close the case if he agreed to conditions that included admitting to the offences and apologising to the parties involved.

A lawyer, who used to work for top law firm Drew and Napier, is accused of molesting his then-colleague once and insulting the woman's modesty on three separate occasions by acts such as snapping pictures of her underwear.

He faces four charges in all and allegedly committed these offences at the Ocean Financial Centre in Collyer Quay in April and October 2017. He cannot be named owing to a gag order to protect the woman's identity.

On the second day of the trial yesterday, the court heard that the lawyer, who is now working for another firm, gave a statement in November 2017 to investigation officer (IO) Thanabalan Kothandapani in which he admitted his alleged offences.

This incriminating statement could potentially be submitted to the court as evidence against him.

He is now contesting its admissibility, stating the IO had offered to close the case if he agreed to conditions that included admitting to the offences and apologising to the parties involved.

When queried by District Judge Samuel Chua yesterday, the man said: "First, there was a guarantee that by doing so, there would be no court proceedings. Second, to my mind, there was something like a settlement negotiation. People do apologise and admit to things which they didn't do in order to procure an amicable closure to matters."

The judge also asked the lawyer why he saw the need to give an apology to exculpate himself.

He replied: "(It's because) of the offer that the IO had given me - that the matter would not go to the AGC (Attorney-General's Chambers) if I did all these things.

"I simply wanted the matter to be closed so I could live my life."

He also said he wanted to avoid the "whole process" of going on trial, adding that if he faced charges, "the matter would have appeared in major news outlets" which would have affected his mother's health.

The man, who is represented by defence lawyer Tan Hee Joek, did not give details about her condition in court yesterday. He is now out on bail of $15,000 and his pre-trial conference will be held on Nov 26.

In a statement, Drew and Napier said it has a "strict zero-tolerance policy" towards misconduct of any nature.

Its spokesman said: "Our colleagues work hard to maintain a supportive and respectful work environment with an open-door policy. We are fully committed to ensuring that every single member of our firm feels safe, and that reported cases of misconduct, sexual or otherwise, are responded to swiftly.

"Appropriate steps were taken when the allegations came to light. As the matter is before the courts, we cannot comment further at this time."

Source: Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction.

 

Print
2738

Theme picker

Latest Headlines

No content

A problem occurred while loading content.

Previous Next
191129-200131_BB_SALCorpDay

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2019 by Singapore Academy of Law
Back To Top