Dentist jailed for making false Chas claims www.singaporelawwatch.sg
Close

HEADLINES

Headlines published in the last 30 days are listed on SLW.

Dentist jailed for making false Chas claims

Dentist jailed for making false Chas claims

Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 04 Jun 2020
Author: Dominic Low

Teo Eu Gene was sentenced to 46 weeks' jail.

A 36-year-old dentist yesterday became the first person to be jailed for cheating the Government through the Community Health Assist Scheme (Chas).

Teo Eu Gene pleaded guilty to 25 counts of cheating by submitting false Chas claims for dental procedures from 2014 to 2015.

His actions caused two polyclinic groups - SingHealth Polyclinics and National Healthcare Group Polyclinics - that process and reimburse Chas claims on behalf of the Ministry of Health (MOH) to wrongfully disburse more than $18,000.

Teo was sentenced to 46 weeks' jail by District Judge Luke Tan. Taken into consideration during sentencing were 35 charges related to submitting other false claims and falsifying medical records.

Chas, started by MOH in 2000, allows all citizens, including those from the Pioneer and Merdeka generations, to receive subsidies for medical and dental care at participating general practitioner clinics and dental clinics. Subsidies for dental treatments range from $11 to about $260 per procedure, depending on factors like the type of procedure and the monthly household income of the recipient.

Court documents state that Teo started Phoenix Dental Surgery, a dental chain with one clinic in Ang Mo Kio and another in Marine Parade, in 2014. Both were participating clinics under Chas at that time, with about 60 per cent of Teo's patients paying for their treatments using Chas. Each clinic operated under a firm that Teo and his wife were directors and shareholders of. Both firms were struck off in 2018.

Besides treating patients, Teo also handled administrative work for Phoenix Dental . This included submitting claims under Chas for his patients through an online portal. As part of the process, a participating dental clinic has to fill in clinical and financial details of the Chas-related patient visits in the online claim form, including the number and type of procedures performed as well as the cost of each procedure before subsidy. Once the claims are approved, the polyclinics will consolidate them for payment to the respective clinics' bank account.

"Investigations revealed that Teo submitted Chas claims to the polyclinics for procedures he did not perform on his patients," Deputy Public Prosecutor V. Jesudevan said yesterday.

Teo inflated the number of procedures he had actually performed on his patients, and substantiated these claims by adding false dental procedures in his patients' medical case notes to avoid detection, the DPP told the court.

Court documents state that the 25 false claims submitted by Teo resulted in the polyclinics making a payout totalling over $30,000 to the dental chain. Of these, over $18,000 was for procedures Teo did not perform.

Defence lawyer Lee Teck Leng said in written mitigation yesterday that Teo has reimbursed MOH over $20,000, which exceeded the total wrongful loss suffered by the polyclinics.

In sentencing Teo, the judge noted that deterrence was the main consideration where the cheating offences were made against a public agency which disbursed public funds. But he agreed with Mr Lee that due weight should be given to Teo's plea of guilt and cooperation with the authorities during the investigation as mitigating factors.

For each offence of cheating, Teo could have been jailed for up to 10 years and fined.

Teo's former colleague at Phoenix Dental, Andy Joshua Warren, is charged with similarly cheating the polyclinics by submitting false Chas claims and falsifying medical records. His case is still pending.

Source: Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction.

Print
1924

Theme picker

Latest Headlines

No content

A problem occurred while loading content.

Previous Next
Tech Law Fest 2020

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2020 by Singapore Academy of Law
Back To Top