Headlines published in the last 30 days are listed on SLW.

Businessman recovers $12.7m from ex-mistress

Businessman recovers $12.7m from ex-mistress

Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 20 Nov 2020
Author: Selina Lum

The Judge accepted Mr Xu's explanation that the sums of money were moved to Ms Wang for temporary safekeeping due to financial difficulties faced by his companies in China at the time.

A married businessman from China who was wooing a flight attendant bought her a $3 million apartment at The Interlace as a birthday present.

On the day she signed purchase documents, he told her to order a Mercedes-Benz of her choice.

After they began their affair, Mr Xu Zhigang transferred two sums totalling US$9.6 million (S$12.9 million) to Ms Wang Fang, in July 2014 and February 2015. Their relationship ended in November 2017.

Last year, Mr Xu sued his former mistress to get back the money, the apartment and the car, claiming that she was holding them on trust for him. Ms Wang, who refused to return the assets, argued that they were gifts.

Yesterday, Mr Xu largely succeeded in his claim to get back the money, after the High Court allowed him to recover about US$9.4 million (S$12.7 million) from Ms Wang.

In a written judgment, Justice Audrey Lim accepted Mr Xu's explanation that the sums of money were moved to Ms Wang for temporary safekeeping as his companies in China were facing financial difficulties at the time.

However, the judge dismissed Mr Xu's claims regarding the apartment and the car, which she concluded were gifts.

Mr Xu, who is in his 40s, used to be the main shareholder of Eastport Petrochemical (Singapore).

He first met Ms Wang on a flight in 2011.

Even before they began a romantic relationship in February 2014, Mr Xu plied her with gifts and gave her benefits, including the use of his ATM card linked to his bank account where his salary of $20,000 per month was deposited.

Between December 2013 and February 2014, Mr Xu transferred $4.2 million to Ms Wang to buy the apartment and the car, both of which were registered in her name. He also got a job for her at his company, which paid her $10,000 a month between April 2014 and June 2016, although she did not do any substantive work.

From end January to early February 2014, the pair spent time together in China, including visiting Ms Wang's parents during Chinese New Year.

Around February 2014, she discovered that Mr Xu had had another relationship, but he assured her that he was no longer seeing the other woman, who worked at his company.

In his lawsuit, Mr Xu, who was represented by Senior Counsel Tan Chee Meng, claimed he had bought the apartment to improve Ms Wang's living conditions as he regarded her as a sibling.

Mr Xu said he bought the car as he needed to meet customers in Singapore. He said he told Ms Wang he would let her drive it, and was not buying it for her.

He said the apartment and the car were registered in her name to make it convenient for her to handle administrative matters concerning the assets.

Justice Lim said Mr Xu's explanations were unconvincing.

However, the judge accepted his explanation that he had transferred US$2.6 million to Ms Wang as part of a plan to insulate Eastport from his troubles in China.

There was also evidence to support Mr Xu's explanation that he had transferred US$7 million to Ms Wang to keep funds out of reach of potential creditors, and to enable him to restart his business.

Ms Wang, who was represented by Senior Counsel Lee Eng Beng, said Mr Xu gave her the money to show his sincerity and gratitude for staying with him and to give her a sense of security.

Source: Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction.


Latest Headlines

No content

A problem occurred while loading content.

Previous Next

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2020 by Singapore Academy of Law
Back To Top